Cwp/426/2016 Of Banarsi Dass v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax Sangrur And Anr
High Court
12 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Cwp/426/2016 Of Banarsi Dass v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax Sangrur And Anr
Date of order
12 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Cwp/426/2016 Of Banarsi Dass v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax Sangrur And Anr, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARR
CWP No. 426-2016Date of decision: 12.01.2016ws. Petitioner
Banarsi Dass
Vs,
Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Sangrur and another
a. Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAJ RAHUL GARG
Present:Mr. Amit Menta, Advocate for the petitioner.
4444
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL,J (ORAL)
The challenge in this writ petition filed under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India, is to the notices dated 31.03.2015 (AnnexureP-3) for the assessment years 2009-10 & 2010-11 issued underSection 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’), and theorders dated 23.11.2015 for the assessment years 2009-10 & 2010-11(Annexures P14 and P15) respectively, wnereby, the objections raisedby the petitioner regarding initiation of assessment proceedings underSection 148 of the Act has been rejected.
? After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for thepetitioner submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the presentwrit petition with liberty to challenge the order rejecting the objectionsraised to initiation of reassessment proceedings under Section 148 oftne Act, before the Appellate Authority in case any adverse order ispassed during the re-assessment proceedings.
‘3Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to thepetitioner to take recourse to the remedies as may be available to him,in accordance with law.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)
JUDGE
12.01.2016smriti
(RAJ RAHUL GARG )|JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.