Case LawHigh Court › Cwp/708/2014 Of M/S Bright Enterprises P...

Cwp/708/2014 Of M/S Bright Enterprises Pvt Ltd v. Astt. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-Ii Jalandhar

High Court 19 Feb 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Cwp/708/2014 Of M/S Bright Enterprises Pvt Ltd v. Astt. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-Ii Jalandhar
Date of order
19 Feb 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Cwp/708/2014 Of M/S Bright Enterprises Pvt Ltd v. Astt. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-Ii Jalandhar, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 19.02.20151)CWP No.708 of 2014 M/s Bright Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. VS_| _..Petitioner Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-II, Jalandhar $%CWP? No.709 of 2014 ....Respondents Smt. Satish Bala Malhotra Petitioner VsS_ Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-I, Jalandhar ....Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH- Present:Mr. Gurminder Singh, Senior Advocate withMr. RPS Bara, Advocatefor the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocatefor the respondents. Rayjive Bhalla, J (Oral By way of this order, we shall decide CWP Nos.708 of 2014and 709 of 2014, as the order impugned in both the petitions are simular.Facts necessary for ‘adjudication’ are being taken from CWP No.708 of2014. The petitioner prays for issuance of a writ of certiorari, seeking the quashing of notice dated 22.03.2013 and order dated 16.12.2013. Counsel for the revenue submits, on instructions from Sh.Aditya Shukla, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-II, thatorder dated 16.12.2013 may be treated as withdrawn, but with liberty topass a fresh order. In view of the statement made by counsel for the revenue, asorder dated 16.12.2013 has been withdrawn, the writ petition is partlyallowed, but with liberty to the revenue to proceed afresh and in accordancewith law, after taking into consideration objections raised by the petitionerin its reply to the show cause notice. The petitioner is also granted liberty tofile an additional response to the show cause notice which shall also betaken into consideration while deciding the objections. If the assessmentorder 1S passed within three months from parties putting in appearancebefore the Assessing Officer, the petitioner shall not be entitled to raise aplea regarding expiry of the period of limitation for finalising theassessment. The parties are directed to appear before the Assessing Officeron 209.03 2015 (Rajive Bhalla)Judge February 19, 2015VC2Zar (Amol Rattan Singh)Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan