Case Law › High Court › Cwp/7848/2021 Of Bharti Airtel Limited v...

Cwp/7848/2021 Of Bharti Airtel Limited v. Commissioiner Of Income Tax (Tds)-2, Chandigarh

High Court 26 Aug 2021 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

26 Aug 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Cwp/7848/2021 Of Bharti Airtel Limited v. Commissioiner Of Income Tax (Tds)-2, Chandigarh, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The petition stands dismissed aswithdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT |CHANDIGARH 205CWP-7848-2021(O0&MDecided on: 26.8.2021 Bharti Airtel Limited....Petitioner VS) Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS)-2 ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH AGNIHOTRIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH AGNIHOTRI Present:Mr. Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit Sud, Advocate and Mr. Sachit Jolly, Advocate for the petitioner. AMr. Chetan Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate for the respondent. #### AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral) imThis writ petition has been filed praying for setting aside ordersdated 9.3.2021 (Annexure P-23 to 32) passed by the respondent vide whichthe application dated 24.2.2021 Annexure P-22 filed by the petitioner forFYs 2005-06 to 2014-15 under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020has been decided. 2.After arguing for some time, learned Senior counsel for thepetitioner states that he has instructions to withdraw the present petition,therefore, prays for permission to withdraw the same.petitioner states that he has instructions to withdraw the present petition,therefore, prays for permission to withdraw the same. onAllowed as prayed for. The petition stands dismissed aswithdrawn. 4 Since the main case has been decided, the pending civilmiscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of, (AJAY TEWARITJUDGE (GIRISH AGNIHOTRI)JUDGE 26.8 2027*%8+*#)* Whether speaking/reasoned-Yes/NoWhether reportable-Yes/No

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.