In Cwp/8052/2024 Of Anuj Kumar Bansal v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN TCHANDIGA
CWP-8052-2024 (O&MDate of Decision: 21.11.20
ANUJ KUMAR BANSAL
. . . . Petitioner
Vs.DEPUTY C OMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS
. . . . Respondents
****
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMANJAY VASHISTH
****
PresentMr. Rana Gurtej Singh, Advocafor the petitioner.
Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Sr. StandiMs. Pridhi Sandhu, Jr. StandingMs. Muskaan Gupta, Advocatefor the respondents/Revenue.
****
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)
l)
1.Learned counsel for the petitionefor
withd
2.Writ Ph
3.All pending applications also stand di
NJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE
November 2Mohit goyal
1. Whet2. Whether speaking/reasoned? her reportable?
Yes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.