Cwp/8377/2022 Of Amardeep v. Income Tax Officer And Ors
High Court
01 Sep 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Cwp/8377/2022 Of Amardeep v. Income Tax Officer And Ors
Date of order
01 Sep 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Cwp/8377/2022 Of Amardeep v. Income Tax Officer And Ors, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-8377-2022 (O&M)Date of decision:01.09.2022
Amardeep
— Petitioner
Vs,
Income Tax Officer & others
... Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA.HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEBPAK MANCHANDA.
Present: Mr. Deepak Agarwal, Advocate for the petitioner,
Mr. Vaibhav Gupta, Jr. Standing counsel,for respondents No.1 to 4 and 6,
TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J.
Instant petition is at the hands of Amardeep.
Challenge in the instant petition is to the order passed undersection 179 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 21.02.2022 pertaining to theassessment year 2015-16.
During the course of hearing today, it has gone uncontrovertedthat the company/assessee i.e. Redhu Farms Pvt. Ltd. had filed the appealagainst the assessment order dated 29.09.2021 for the same very assessmentyear (Annexure P-4) and the same was rejected. The matter thereafter hadbeen carried over to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and is now pendingthere.
Yet another fact that stands admitted is that even the Director ofthe Assessee/company has also filed an appeal under CIT appeals before theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal and the same is also pending,
CWP-8377-2022 (O&M)
In view of such conceded factual premise, we are of the
considered view that no basis for interference 1S made out in the instantpetition.
Without even adverting to the merits of the controversy, writpetition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA)JUDGE
(DEEPAK MANCHANDA)JUDGE
01.09.2022harjeet(v) Whether speaking/reasonedYes/No(vi) Whether reportable?Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.