Case LawHigh Court › Cwp/922/2017 Of Principal Commissioner O...

Cwp/922/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Gurgaon v. Jatender Kumar Mehta And Anr

High Court 24 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Cwp/922/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Gurgaon v. Jatender Kumar Mehta And Anr
Date of order
24 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Cwp/922/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Gurgaon v. Jatender Kumar Mehta And Anr, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : 24.02.2020 CWP No.922 of 2017 (O&M) The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,Gurgaon Petitioner VeTSuU Jatender Kumar Mehta and anr. ...... Respondents CWP No.939 of 2017 (O&M) Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,Gurgaon Petitioner VeTSuU M/S Omax Autos Ltd. and anr....... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICEKE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICAVNEESH JHINGAN /// Present :-.Mr.Kunal Sharma, Advocate andMr. Jitin Kohli, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Abhilaksh Grover, Advocatefor the respondents, /// AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) )This order shall dispose of above mentioned two petitions. +Both these petitions have been filed challenging thesettlement made by the Income Tax Settlement Commission. © .After arguing for sometime, it has been agreed by both the learned counsel that the matters may be referred back to the SettlementCommission for a fresh decision in accordance with law. /We find this to be a fair request. Consequently, withoutcommenting on the merits of the case, we Set aside the orders and both thepetitions stand disposed of by remanding the matters back to the IncomeTax Settlement Commission to take a fresh decision in accordance withlaw. 2Parties through counsel are directed to appear before theIncome Tax Settlement Commission on 17.03.2020. 5Since the main cases have been decided, the pending civilmiscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI )JUDGE 24.02.2020pooja sharma-lWhether speaking/reasonedWhether Reportable | ( AVNEESH JHINGAN)JUDGE Yes/NoYes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan