In Cytecare Hospitals Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circe 1(1)(1) Or His Successor, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 19848 of 2021
==========================================================
CYTECARE HOSPITALS PRIVATE LIMITED VersusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCE 1(1)(1) OR HISSUCCESSOR
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR DHINAL A SHAH(12077) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1MR. M.R.BHATT, SR. ADV. FOR M R BHATT & CO.(5953) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIAandHONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
Date : 30/08/2022
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA)
Learned advocate Mr. Dhinal Shah for the petitioner seekspermission to withdraw the petition stating that the Assessment Orderdated 18.2.2022 has been passed by the Assessing Officer and thereforethe cause does not survive to prosecute the petition. Learned senioradvocate Mr. M. R. Bhatt for M.R.Bhatt & Co., who represents therespondent, has no objection to the withdrawal of the petition.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Notice isdischarged. Interim orders are vacated.
(N.V.ANJARIA, J)
(BHARGAV D. KARIA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.