Case LawHigh Court › Cyuator Media Services Pvt. Ltd v. Assis...

Cyuator Media Services Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 6(2)(1) And Ors

High Court 10 Jan 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Cyuator Media Services Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 6(2)(1) And Ors
Date of order
10 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Cyuator Media Services Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 6(2)(1) And Ors, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

SANTOSHSUBHASHKULKARNI Digitally signed bySANTOSH SUBHASHKULKARNIDate: 2022.01.1018:01:40 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION 3502 OF 2019 Cyuator Media Services Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 6(2)(1) and ors. ...Respondents Mr. Percy Pardiwalla, Senior Advocate, i/b Jay NileshBhansali, for the Petitioner. Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Respondents. CORAM:K. R. SHRIRAM &N. J. JAMADAR, JJDATED:10[th] JANUARY, 2022(Video Conferencing) -PC: 1.Heard the learned Counsels and, in our view, the followingorder meets ends of justice: (a)The Assessing Officer before passing an assessmentorder shall give an opportunity to petitioner to explain,inter alia, why Section 56 (2) (vii-a) (vii-b) will not apply. (b)Of course, petitioner will be entitled to raise all otherpoints as well, which shall be considered by the AssessingOfficer before passing the assessment order. (c)The Assessing Officer shall give petitioner a personal hearing and also issue a notice fixing the date of personal hearing at least seven days in advance. (d)The Assessing Officer shall deal with all the submissions made by petitioner in the assessment order. 2.The petition accordingly stands disposed. 3.We also clarify that we have not made any observations onmerits of the case. merits of the case. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.][K. R. SHRIRAM, J.]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan