Cyuator Media Services Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 6(2)(1) And Ors
High Court
10 Jan 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Cyuator Media Services Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 6(2)(1) And Ors
Date of order
10 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Cyuator Media Services Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 6(2)(1) And Ors, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
SANTOSHSUBHASHKULKARNI
Digitally signed bySANTOSH SUBHASHKULKARNIDate: 2022.01.1018:01:40 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION 3502 OF 2019
Cyuator Media Services Pvt. Ltd.
...Petitioner
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 6(2)(1) and ors.
...Respondents
Mr. Percy Pardiwalla, Senior Advocate, i/b Jay NileshBhansali, for the Petitioner. Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Respondents.
CORAM:K. R. SHRIRAM &N. J. JAMADAR, JJDATED:10[th] JANUARY, 2022(Video Conferencing)
-PC:
1.Heard the learned Counsels and, in our view, the followingorder meets ends of justice:
(a)The Assessing Officer before passing an assessmentorder shall give an opportunity to petitioner to explain,inter alia, why Section 56 (2) (vii-a) (vii-b) will not apply.
(b)Of course, petitioner will be entitled to raise all otherpoints as well, which shall be considered by the AssessingOfficer before passing the assessment order.
(c)The Assessing Officer shall give petitioner a personal
hearing and also issue a notice fixing the date of personal
hearing at least seven days in advance.
(d)The Assessing Officer shall deal with all the
submissions made by petitioner in the assessment order.
2.The petition accordingly stands disposed.
3.We also clarify that we have not made any observations onmerits of the case. merits of the case.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.][K. R. SHRIRAM, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.