D v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I
High Court
06 Dec 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
D v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I
Date of order
06 Dec 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In D v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.All the appeals are dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHANBENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B.INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 37 / 2015
Appellant
M/s. Punsumi India Limited (In Liquidation)
D-16, Meera Marg, Bani Park, Jaipur
Through its Ex-Director Sh. Vishnu Kumar Bhargava S/o LateSh. G.G. Bhargava, aged 69 years approx. by caste Brahimin
Vs.
Respondents
1.The Commissioner of Income Tax-I,
New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur
2.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-3
New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur
Connected With
D.B.INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 38 / 2015
Appellant
M/s. Punsumi India Limited (In Liquidation)
D-16, Meera Marg, Bani Park, Jaipur
Through its Ex-Director Sh. Vishnu Kumar Bhargava S/o LateSh. G.G. Bhargava, aged 69 years approx. by caste Brahimin
Vs.
Respondents
1.The Commissioner of Income Tax-I,
New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur
2.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-3
New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur
D.B.INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 39 / 2015
Appellant
M/s. Punsumi India Limited (In Liquidation)
D-16, Meera Marg, Bani Park, Jaipur
Through its Ex-Director Sh. Vishnu Kumar Bhargava S/o LateSh. G.G. Bhargava, aged 69 years approx. by caste Brahimin
Vs.
Respondents
1.The Commissioner of Income Tax-I,
New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur
2.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-3New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur.New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur.
__________________________________________
For Appellant :Mr. Naresh Gupta
For Respondents :
Mr. Anuroop Singhi
__________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Judgment
Per Hon’ble Jhaveri, J.
06/12/2016
1.The delay in filing Appeal No. 39/2015 is condoned. Theapplication under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is allowed.application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is allowed.
2.We are informed by the Counsel for the appellant thatpursuant to the order of remand, fresh assessment order hasbeen passed. In that view of the matter, it will not beappropriate to examine the matter only for the academicpurpose.
3.All the appeals are dismissed. However, it will be open forthe assessee to raise all grounds (including the grounds raisedherein) before the CIT (Appeals). We hope that CIT (Appeals)will consider all the objections/arguments of the assessee intrue spirit. A copy of this order be placed in each of the file.
(DINESH MEHTA)J. (K.S. JHAVERI)J.
bblm
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.