Case LawHigh Court › D v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I

D v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I

High Court 06 Dec 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
D v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I
Date of order
06 Dec 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In D v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3.All the appeals are dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHANBENCH AT JAIPUR D.B.INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 37 / 2015 Appellant M/s. Punsumi India Limited (In Liquidation) D-16, Meera Marg, Bani Park, Jaipur Through its Ex-Director Sh. Vishnu Kumar Bhargava S/o LateSh. G.G. Bhargava, aged 69 years approx. by caste Brahimin Vs. Respondents 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-3 New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur Connected With D.B.INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 38 / 2015 Appellant M/s. Punsumi India Limited (In Liquidation) D-16, Meera Marg, Bani Park, Jaipur Through its Ex-Director Sh. Vishnu Kumar Bhargava S/o LateSh. G.G. Bhargava, aged 69 years approx. by caste Brahimin Vs. Respondents 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-3 New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur D.B.INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 39 / 2015 Appellant M/s. Punsumi India Limited (In Liquidation) D-16, Meera Marg, Bani Park, Jaipur Through its Ex-Director Sh. Vishnu Kumar Bhargava S/o LateSh. G.G. Bhargava, aged 69 years approx. by caste Brahimin Vs. Respondents 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-3New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur.New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur. __________________________________________ For Appellant :Mr. Naresh Gupta For Respondents : Mr. Anuroop Singhi __________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Judgment Per Hon’ble Jhaveri, J. 06/12/2016 1.The delay in filing Appeal No. 39/2015 is condoned. Theapplication under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is allowed.application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is allowed. 2.We are informed by the Counsel for the appellant thatpursuant to the order of remand, fresh assessment order hasbeen passed. In that view of the matter, it will not beappropriate to examine the matter only for the academicpurpose. 3.All the appeals are dismissed. However, it will be open forthe assessee to raise all grounds (including the grounds raisedherein) before the CIT (Appeals). We hope that CIT (Appeals)will consider all the objections/arguments of the assessee intrue spirit. A copy of this order be placed in each of the file. (DINESH MEHTA)J. (K.S. JHAVERI)J. bblm
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan