D B Investments v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 23(1)(2) Mumbai
High Court
09 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
D B Investments v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 23(1)(2) Mumbai
Date of order
09 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In D B Investments v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 23(1)(2) Mumbai, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3012 OF 2008IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 2724 OF 2008
D B Investments
Versus
The Income Tax Officer, Ward 23(1)(2) Mumbai
).. Appellant
).. Respondent
Mr S G Dalal a/w Ms Priti Shah for the Appellant.Mrs Devki Iyer for the Respondent.
CORAM:SWATANTER KUMAR, C. J. & A.P. DESHPANDE, J.DATED: 9TH SEPTEMBER 2008.
P.C.
Notice. As per the directions of the Court, Mrs. Devki Iyer,
learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent, waives service onbehalf of the Department and accepts notice.2.The present Notice of Motion has been filed by the Assessee
for condonation of 11 days' delay in filing the Appeal. No reply to theMotion has been filed. In fact, there is no serious opposition. Evenotherwise, we are satisfied from the averments made in the affidavit insupport of the Motion that sufficient cause has been shown for
condonation of delay. Keeping in view the principles stated by thisCourt in the case of Ornate Traders Private Limited vs The Income TaxOfficer, Ward 3(2)(3), Mumbai, Notice of Motion No.2281 of 2008 inIncome Tax Appeal (Lodging) No.1814 of 2008 and other connectedmatters decided on 29[th] August 2008, we condone the delay.
3.Notice of Motion made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
4.Notice of Motion disposed of accordingly.
5..List the Appeal for admission on 29[th] September 2008.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A. P. DESHPANDE, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.