Case LawHigh Court › Dakshata Fiance & Investment Pvt.ltd v....

Dakshata Fiance & Investment Pvt.ltd v. Income Tax Officerf 8(1)(3), Mumbai

High Court 02 Jul 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Dakshata Fiance & Investment Pvt.ltd v. Income Tax Officerf 8(1)(3), Mumbai
Date of order
02 Jul 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Dakshata Fiance & Investment Pvt.ltd v. Income Tax Officerf 8(1)(3), Mumbai, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO. O. C. J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1395 OF 2010 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1127 OF 2010 Dakshata Fiance & Investment Pvt.Ltd....Appellant. Vs.Income Tax Officerf 8(1)(3), Mumbai. ...Respondent. .... Mr.Niraj Sheth with Mr.Rajesh Poojari i/b.MINT AND CONFERERESfor the Appellant.Mr.P.S.Sahadevan i/b. Ms.Padma Divakar for the Respondent. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. July 2, 2010. P.C. : There is a delay of 115 days on the part of the assessee in filing the appeal. The delay has been occasioned since the assessee has moved a Miscellaneous Application under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, before the Tribunal which was rejected on 23 March 2010. The delay has been satisfactorily explained in the affidavit in support of the Motion. The Motion is accordingly made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). ( Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.) ( J.P.Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan