In Dakshata Fiance & Investment Pvt.ltd v. Income Tax Officerf 8(1)(3), Mumbai, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: On the request of Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, the Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO. O. C. J.
WRIT PETITION NO.1171 OF 2010
Dakshata Fiance & Investment Pvt.Ltd....Petitioner.
Vs.
Income Tax Officerf 8(1)(3), Mumbai. ...Respondent.
....
Mr.Niraj Sheth with Mr.Rajesh Poojari i/b.MINT AND CONFERERESfor the Petitioner.Mr.P.S.Sahadevan i/b. Ms.Padma Divakar for the Respondent.
.....
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
July 2, 2010.
P.C. :
In view of the order that has been passed in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1127 of 2010, Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner states that he would not press the Petition and would seek leave to withdraw. On the request of Counsel appearing on
behalf of the Petitioner, the Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
( Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
( J.P.Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue