Date Of Decision: 19.05.2025 v. Income Tax Officer & Others
High Court
19 May 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Date Of Decision: 19.05.2025 v. Income Tax Officer & Others
Date of order
19 May 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Date Of Decision: 19.05.2025 v. Income Tax Officer & Others, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal under Section 148, Section 151 of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether approved for reporting ?[1] For the Petitioner:Mr
Decision: The petition is disposed of in above terms, so also thepending application(s), if any
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
( 2025:HHC:14733 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No. 7267 of 2025
Date of decision: 19.05.2025
Neesha Thakur ….Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Officer & others
….Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting ?[1]
For the Petitioner:Mr. Vishal Mohan, Senior Advocate with Mr.Praveen Sharma and Mr. Varun Gupta,Advocates.
For the Respondents:Mr. Neeraj Sharma and Mr. Ishan Kashyap,Advocates, for the respondents.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
The instant petition has been filed for grant of the following
substantive relief:-
“(i) That this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue writ in thenature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction,thereby quashing/setting aside the impugned notice under Section148, dated 05.04.2023 (Annexure P-4) and impugned order dated28.03.2025 (Annexure P-7) being illegal, without jurisdiction,against the procedure and further based on the illegalsanction/approval under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act, 1961and all proceedings/actions consequent thereto.”
2. The subject matter of the challenge in this petition, whereby
the legality, validity and propriety of impugned notice under Section 148,
1
Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 ( 2025:HHC:14733 )
dated 05.04.2023 (Annexure P-4) and impugned order dated 28.03.2025(Annexure P-7) is already under consideration before the Hon’bleSupreme Court of India in SLP (c) Diary No. 17041/2024., case titledUnion of India & Ors. Vs. Association of Technical TextilesManufacturers and Processors & Anr.
3.Since the issue involved in this petition is already pendingconsideration before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, therefore, keeping inview the judicial discipline, we refrain ourselves from giving our opinionwith respect to impugned notice under Section 148, dated 05.04.2023(Annexure P-4) and impugned order dated 28.03.2025 (Annexure P-7), asassailed in this petition. We direct that the present petition shall begoverned by the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court and thedecision thereto, shall be binding on this case also.
The petition is disposed of in above terms, so also thepending application(s), if any.
( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Judge
( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge Judge
May 19, 2025 (raman)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.