Date Of Judgment 01-08-2018 I.t.a v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax & Anr

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU. DATED THIS THE O1[Ss]DAY OF AUGUST 2018| PRESENT THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND THE HON’BLE Mrs.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA| I.T.A.No.410/2016 BETWEEN: HEWLETT PACKARD (INDIA) SOFTWARE >OPERATION PVT. LITD.,sy. No.192, WHITEFILED ROAD|MAHADBVAPURA POSTBANGALORBE-560048jALSO AT No.29, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BANGALORE].RBEPRBSEBENTBD HBRBIN BY ITS DIRECTMr. BELAVADI RAMASWAMY KIRAN. _ APPBLLANT (By Mr. SANDEEP HUILGOL, ADV., FORMr. T. SURYANARAYANA, ADV.,) AND: 1.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF [INCOME TAXCIRCLE-3(1)(1), [ERSTWHILE DEPUTYCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-11(4)]BMTC BUILDING, 30 FIT ROADKORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-5S60095.CIRCLE-3(1)(1), [ERSTWHILE DEPUTYCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-11(4)]BMTC BUILDING, 30 FIT ROADKORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-5S60095. 2.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXBMTC BUILDING, 30 FIT ROADKORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-5S60001.BMTC BUILDING, 30 FIT ROADKORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-5S60001. ~ RESPONDENTS (By Mr. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADV..,) Date of Judgment 01-08-2018 I.T.A.No.410/2016 Hewlett Packard (India) Software Operation Pvt. Ltd., Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax & Anr. THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE IT|ACT, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONSOF LAW. ALLOW THER APPEAL AND SEI ASIDE THER ORDER OF)THEITAT,|“A?BENCH,BENGALURU,PRONOUNCEDON|09/03/2016 IN IT(TP)A No.1304/BANG/2011 (ANNEXURE-E), TO.THE EXTENT QUESTIONED HEREIN & ETC. THIS LT.A. COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY,S. SUJATHAJT DRBLIVERBD THE FOLLOWING : JUDGMENT Mr. Sandeep Huilgol,Adv. for | Mr. T. Suryanarayana, Adv. for Appellant- Assessee|Mr. Jeevan J. Neeralgi1,Adv. for Respondents -Revenue| 1. Learned counsel for the Appellant-Assessee hasfiled a Memo seeking withdrawal of the Appeal. 2. Learned counsel for the Respondents-Revenuehas no objection. 3.|Thesaid Memo1SplacedOT]record. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/-. JUDGE Sd/-. JUDGE|