Case Law › High Court › Date Of Judgment 06-07-2018 I.t.a v. M/S...

Date Of Judgment 06-07-2018 I.t.a v. M/S. Ge Intelligent Platform Pvt. Ltd

High Court 06 Jul 2018 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · karnataka_bng_old

Parties

Date of order

06 Jul 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Date Of Judgment 06-07-2018 I.t.a v. M/S. Ge Intelligent Platform Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU.DATED THIS THE O0 DAY OF JULY 2ZO18 PRESENT THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND THE HON’BLE Mrs.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA| I.T.A.No.829/2017 BETWEEN: 1.THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIT{(A)5[‘T]FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA|BENGALURU-560 OOD.5[‘T]FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA|BENGALURU-560 OOD. 2.THER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMBE-TACIRCLE-3(1)(2), 2 KFLOOR|CIRCLE-3(1)(2), 2 KFLOOR| BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA|BENGALURU-560 OOD.BENGALURU-560 OOD. .. APPBLLANT (By Mr. ARAVIND K.V. ADV.) AND: M/S. GE INTELLIGENT PLATFORM PVT. LTD.,1 FLOOR, BUILDING 9, 43HLECTRONIC CITY, HOSUR ROADBBENGALURU-560 100PAN: AAACG 7573K.. RESPONDENT (By Mr. C.K. NANDAKUMAR, ADV.) THIS I.T.A IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME|TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL|QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE. ALLOW THE APPEAL ANDSET ASIDKBR THR ORDBRS PASSBD BY THR [NCOME-TA Date of Judgment 06-07-2018 I.T.A.No.829/2017 The Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax, CIT(A) & Anr. Vs. M/s. GE intelligent Platform Pvt. Ltd., 2/2 APPBRLLATETRIBUNAL, BENGALURUIN|IT(TP)ANo.148/Bang/20195DATED04-04-2017CONFIRMINGTHEORDER OF THR DRP AND CONFIRM THRE ORDER PASSED BYTHE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(2),.BBNGALURU 7 BIC. | THIS LT.A. COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAYS. SUJATHAJT DRBLIVERBD THE FOLLOWING : JUDGMENT Mr. Aravind K.V.Adv. for Appellants-Revenue | Mr. C.K. Nandakumar,Adv. for Respondent -Assessee 1. Learned counsel for the Appellants-Revenue Mr.K.V.Aravind has filed a Memo seeking withdrawal ofthe appeal. 2. Learned counsel for the Respondent-AssesseeMr.C.K.Nandakumar has no objection. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn. Sd/-. JUDGE Sd/-| JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.