Date Of Judgment 11-07-2018 I.t.a v. M/S. Cisco Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd
High Court
11 Jul 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Date Of Judgment 11-07-2018 I.t.a v. M/S. Cisco Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
11 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Date Of Judgment 11-07-2018 I.t.a v. M/S. Cisco Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 11[th]DAY OF JULY 2018
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI
AND
THE HON’BLE Mrs. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
I.T.A.No.88/2013
Between:|
Ll.The Commissioner of Income- Tax,
C.R. Building, Queens Road,
Bangalore.
iaThe Additional Commissioner of Income-Tax,
Range — 11, C.R.Buildings,Queens Road,Bangalore.Queens Road,Bangalore.
..Appellants
#By Mr. K.V.Aravind, Advocate)
And:
M/s Cisco Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd.,
Divyashree Chambers,B Wing, No.11,O Shoughnessey Road,Off Langford Road,Bangalore — 560 O25.
... Respondent
(By Mr. Mallaha Rao, K., Advocate)
This I.T.A. is filed under Section 260-A of Income Tax|Act 1961, praying to (a) Formulate the substantial questions
Date of Judgment 11-07-2018 I.T.A.No.88/2013 Vs. M/s. Cisco Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd.,
The Commissioner of Income- Tax & Anr.
2/2
of law stated therein, (b) allow the appeal and set aside theOrder|passedby|the.ITAT,BangaloreinSP|NO.189/Bang/2012In|ITA|NO.|1910/Bang/2012dated01/02/2013 Annexure-D, in the interest of justice & equityetc.
This I.T.A. coming on for Admission, this day |
Dr. Vineet KothariJ. delivered the following:-
JU DBGMENT
Mr. K.V. Aravind.Adv. for Appellants — Revenue
Mr. Mallaha RaoKAdv. for Respondent — Assessee -_Absent
1. The learned counsel appearing for the
appellants - Revenue, Mr.K.V. Aravind wants to
withdraw this appeal as it has become infructuous. _
2. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn.
3. The copy of this appeal may be sent to the
Respondent — Assessee forthwith.
BMV*
Sd/-JUDGE|
Sd/-.JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue