Date Of Judgment 17-07-2018, Ita v. Income-Tax Officer
High Court
17 Jul 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Date Of Judgment 17-07-2018, Ita v. Income-Tax Officer
Date of order
17 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Date Of Judgment 17-07-2018, Ita v. Income-Tax Officer, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Learned counsel for the respondent-Revenue has no objections. — Taking the memo on record, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1/ DAY OF JULY 2O18|
PRESENT
THR HON’BLEK DR.JUSTICE VINBBT KOTHARI
ANT)
THR HON’BLE MRS..JUSTICK S.SUJATHA
I.T.A. No.353/2015
BETWEEN:
M/S GENISYS INFORMATION SYSTEMSINDIA PVT. LTD,NO.43-46, & 33-36, EXPORT PROMOTIONINDUSTRIAL PARK, WHITEFIELD ROAD,BENGALURU — 560 O66(REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR,oRIM.NANDAKISHORE,AGED ABOUT 957 YEARS,9/O LATE U B MENON)_ APPBRLLANT
(BY SRI.S.SHARATH, ADV.)
AND:|
INCOME - TAX OFFICERWARD - 11 (2))[‘T]FLOOR, RASHTHROTHANA BHAVAN,NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,BBENGALURU — 560 OO]_. RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.K V ARAVIND, ADV.)
THIS [TA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME|TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED:19/059/2019PASSED IN MA NO. 27(B)/2015 IN IT(TP)A NO.17/BANG/2014,|FOR THR ASSBSSMENT YRBAR 2VJOOO-JO010 ANNEBEXURPRAYING TO: I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS|
OF LAW STATBRD ABOVE II. ALLOW THR APPBAL AND SBTASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT, BENGALURU ‘'A‘BENCH|BEHARINGLN|MA|NO.27(B)/20109LN|IT(TP)ANO.17/BANG/2014 DATED:15/05/2015 ANNEXURE - A ANDBITC.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY,S.SUJATHA, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JU DBiGMENT
Mr.S.Sharath,Adv. for Appellant — Revenue.
Mr.K.V.Aravind,Adv. for Respondent — Assessee.
Learned counsel for the appellant-Assessee has
filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw theappeal.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Revenue has
no objections. —
Taking the memo on record, the appeal is
dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-.JUDGE|
Sd/-.JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.