Case LawHigh Court › Date Of Judgment 17-07-2018, Ita v. Inco...

Date Of Judgment 17-07-2018, Ita v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 17 Jul 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Date Of Judgment 17-07-2018, Ita v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
17 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Date Of Judgment 17-07-2018, Ita v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Learned counsel for the respondent-Revenue hasno objections. — Taking the memo on record, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1/ DAY OF JULY 2O18| PRESENT THR HON’BLEK DR.JUSTICE VINBBT KOTHARI ANT) THR HON’BLE MRS..JUSTICK S.SUJATHA I.T.A. No.354/2015 BETWEEN : M/s GENISYS INFORMATIONSYSTEMS INDIA PVT. LTD.,NO.43-46 & 33-36,EXPORT PROMOTION INDUSTRIAL PARK, |WHITEFIELD ROAD,BENGALURU-560 O66.REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR,oRI M.NANDAKISHORE,AGED ABOUT 957 YEARS, S/O LATE U.B.MENON|APPRLLANT| (BY SRI S.SHARATH, ADV.) AND : INCOME-TAX OFFICERWARD-11 (2), 5[‘T]FLOOR, ~RASHTHROTHANA BHAVAN,NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,BBRENGALURU-560 OO_. RESPONDENT. (BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADV.) THIS [TA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME|TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 12.09.2014PASSED IN IT(TP)A NO.17/BANG/2014, FOR THE ASSESSMENTYREAR 2JOO9-2010 ANNBXURE-A. PRAYING TO: [. FORMULAT Date of Judgment 17-07-2018, ITA No.354/2015 M/s Genisys Information Systems India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE. II.|ALLOW THR APPBAL AND SBT ASIDE THR IMPUGNBD ORDER|(SO FAR AS SAME IS PREJUDICIAL TO THE APPELLANT) OF THE.ITAT,|BBENGALURU‘ALBBENCHBBRARINGIN|IT(TP)ANO.17/BANG/2014, DATED 12.09.2014 ANNEXURE-A. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,|S. SUJATHA, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JU DBiGMENT Mr. S.Sharath,Adv. for Appellant — Assessee.| Mr. M.V.Aravind,Adv. for Respondent — Revenue. Learned counsel for the appellant-Assessee hasfiled a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw theappeal. Learned counsel for the respondent-Revenue hasno objections. — Taking the memo on record, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. In. Sd/-. JUDGE| Sd/-.JUDGE|
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan