Date Of Judgment 28-06-2018 I.t.a v. Shri.channakeshava Murthy-Huf
High Court
28 Jun 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Date Of Judgment 28-06-2018 I.t.a v. Shri.channakeshava Murthy-Huf
Date of order
28 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
2006-2007
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Date Of Judgment 28-06-2018 I.t.a v. Shri.channakeshava Murthy-Huf, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU.DATED THIS THE 28[th]DAY OF JUNE 2018
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI
AND
THE HON’BLE Mrs.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA|I.T.A.No.455/2017
BETWEEN:
1.Pr. Commissioner ofIncome lax-6,.Income lax-6,.
BMTC Complex, Kormangala,Bengaluru.Kormangala,Bengaluru.
OoThe Income Tax Officer,
Ward-6(3)(2),
BMTC Complex, Kormangala,Bengaluru.Kormangala,Bengaluru.
.. APPELLANT
(By Mr.E.I.Sanmathi, Advocate)
AND:
shri Channakeshava Murthy-HUF,No.T-O1A/0O1B,Fortune Icon Apartments, Byatarayanapura,vahakarnagar,Yelahanka Hobli, Bengaluru-560 092.|
. RESPONDENT
(By MrA.Shankar & Sri.M.Lava, Advocates)
THIS L.T.A IS FILED UNDER SBCTION 2J60-A OF INCOME|TAX ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DT.20.1.2017 PASSEDIN ITA NO.1234/B/2016, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-2007.
THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,Dr. VINEET KOTHARIJ. DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING :-
JUDGMENT
Mr.E.I.Sanmathi,Adv. for AppellantMr.A.Shankar & Sri.M.Lava,Advs. for Respondent
In.V1EWOT the CircularNo.21/2015|
(F.No.279/MISC.142/2007-IT)issuedby|theC.B.D.T|directing that the appeals before High Court with the taxeffect of less than Rs.20,00,000/- need not be argued onmerits, the present appeal filed by the revenue with the taxeffect of Rs.13.28 lakhs as stated in the memorandum ofappeal, is dismissed as not maintainable. |
bnv
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue