Date Of Order 01-08-2017 W.p v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 & Anr

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU. DATED THIS THE O1[Ss]DAY OF AUGUST 2017| BEFORE THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI 'WRIT PETITION No.26567/2017 (TIT) BETWEEN: SMT. DEBVA DEVIW/O D. CHANDANMAL|AGED ABOUT 58 YBARS|PROPRIETRIX M/S. VAIBHAV STORESSRNG COMPLEX1091,1 FLOOR, OTC ROADBANGALORE-560 OO2. (BY SRI. B.P. GANDHI, ADV.) _ PRTITIONBR AND: 1.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONBR OF|INCOME TAX — 5)ROOM No.938, 3 KFLOOR,80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALABANGALORE -560 095. 2.THER INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 95(1), II] FLOOR80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA|BANGALORE - 560 OQO5.~ RESPONDENTS(BY SRI. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADV.) THIS W.P. IS FILBED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE.CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO [SSUB OF A WRIT OFMANDAMUS OR ANY OTHBR WRIT OR DIRECTION OT THRBKIRST RESPONDENT TO RBHBAR AND PASS ORDERS ON THR 2/3 REVISION PRITTTION OF THR PRTTTIONBR FILED UNDERSECTION 264 ANNEXURE-A AT THE BARLIEST & ETC. THIS W.P. COMING ON FOR PRBLIMINARY HEARING THIS|DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:- ORDER Mr. B.P. Gandhi,Adv. tor PetitionerMr.Jeevan J. Neeralgi,Adv. for Respondents 1. The only grievance raised in the present writpetition1S|that|the.1[74]Respondent-PrincipalCommissioner of Income Tax-5, Bangalore, has failed todecide the Revision Petition filed under Section 264 ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Assessment Year2012-13 filed by the assessee on00.09.2016. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submittedthat despite lapse of considerable period after the saiddate, since the 1[74]Respondent has not taken up the saidRevision Petition for hearing, the present writ petition isfiled. Date of Order 01-08-2017 W.P.No.26567/2017 Smt. Deeva Devi Vs. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-5 & Anr., 3/3 3. The learned counsel for the Respondents-Department Mr.Jeevan J.Neeralgi is requested to takenotice and a copy of the writ petition has been suppliedto him. 4. After hearing the learned counsels, this Court isof the opinion that the present writ petition deserves tobe disposed of, with a direction to the 1[74]Respondent-Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-5, Bangalore, todecide the said pending Revision Petition expeditiously,preferably within a period of three months from today.The petitioner may appear before the said Authority inthe first instance on10.08.2017. oD. With these observations, the petition isdisposed of. No costs. Srl. od/-| JUDGE