Date Of Order 01-08-2017 W.p v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU. DATED THIS THE O1[Ss]DAY OF AUGUST 2017| BEFORE THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI (WRIT PETITION No.3714/2016 (TIT) BETWEEN: J. MANJUNATH (HUF)|REP. BY ITS KARTHA|SRI. JZ. MANJUNATHAGED ABOUT 48 YBARS|#200/1-22, SRI. NANJUNADESHWARA NILAYA( CRObsS»s, MAIN, VENKATAPURA EXTENSIONKORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560 034. _ PRTITIONBR (BY SRI. G. VENKATESH, ADV. FOR SRI. A. SHANKAR, ADV.) AND: 1.THERE CHIBF COMMISSIONBR OF INCOME TABENGALURU-1I, C.R. BUILDINGSQUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE-5S60001.BENGALURU-1I, C.R. BUILDINGSQUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE-5S60001. 2.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONBR OF INCOME TAX.CENTRAL-KARNATAKA, C.R. BUILDINGSQUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE-560 OO1.CENTRAL-KARNATAKA, C.R. BUILDINGSQUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE-560 OO1. 3.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONBR OF INCOME TAX.BENGALURU-4, C.R. BUILDINGSQUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE-560 OO1..BENGALURU-4, C.R. BUILDINGSQUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE-560 OO1.. 4THER TAX RECOVERY OFFICHR-4GROUND FLOOR, UNITY BUILDING ANNEXEMISSION ROAD, BANGALORE-560 027.GROUND FLOOR, UNITY BUILDING ANNEXEMISSION ROAD, BANGALORE-560 027. 2/4 5.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF [INCOME TAXCIRCLE 4(3)(1), KENDRIYA SADAN BUILDINGKORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-o60 034. ~ RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADV.) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 2296 & 227 OF THE|CONSTITUTION OF [NDIA PRAYING TO [SSUB A WRIT OF|MANDAMUS AND DIRBCTION IN THR NATURE OF A WRIT OF|MANDAMUS AND DIRECT THR RESPONDENT No.3 TO HBAR|AND PASS AN APPROPRIATKH ORDER IN RBESPBKRCT OF PERTITION DATRBD 29-06-2009 FILED BY THR PRTITIONEUNDER THR PROVISIONS OF SBCTION 264 OF THR INCOME|TAXACT,1961|(ANNE XURE-A)IN|RBESPBKCOF.THEASSEHKSSMENT YEAR 2JOO6-07 & BI THIS W.P. COMING ON FOR PRBLIMINARY HEBARING IN ‘B’GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:- ORDER Mr. G. Venkatesh,forMr. A. Shankar, Advs. for Petitioner ©Mr. Jeevan J. Neeralgi,Adv. for Respondents 1. The only grievance raised in the present writpetition1S|that.the.([34]Respondent-PrincipalCommissioner of Income Tax-4, Bangalore, has failed todecide the Revision Petition filed under Section 264 otthe Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Assessment Year)2006-07 filed by the assessee on22.06.2009. Date of Order 01-08-2017 W.P.No.3714/2016 J. Manjunath (HUF) Vs. The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. 3/4 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submittedthat despite lapse of considerable period after the saiddate, since the 3[34]Respondent has not taken up thesaid Revision Petition for hearing, the present writpetition is filed. 3. The learned counsel for the Respondents-Department Mr.Jeevan J.Neeralgi is requested to takenotice and a copy of the writ petition has been suppliedto him.. 4. After hearing the learned counsels, this Court isof the opinion that the present writ petition deserves tobe disposed of, with a direction to the 3[34]Respondent-_|Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Bangalore, todecide the said pending Revision Petition expeditiously,preferably within a period of three months from today. —The petitioner may appear before the said Authority inthe first instance on10.08.2017. J. Manjunath (HUF) Vs. The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. 4/4 '��"98<�8<767�-F6735@89-:6!�8<7�;78989-:�96� 496;-674�-2���-�A-686�� �3=�� �4� � �����������