Date Of Order 22-10-2018 W.p v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) & Anr
High Court
22 Oct 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Date Of Order 22-10-2018 W.p v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) & Anr
Date of order
22 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Date Of Order 22-10-2018 W.p v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) & Anr, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: 4 [In view of the said statement of the learnedcounsel for the Respondent Department, the presentwrit petition is disposed of with a direction to theRespondent Authority, viz. the Principal Commissionerof Income Tax (Central), Central Revenue Building,Queen’s Road, Bengaluru, to re-consider the requ...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU.
DATED THIS THE 22[nd]DAY OF OCTOBER 2018
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI(WRIT PETITION No.30405/2018 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
Shri. Chandrashekar Bhat.Aged about 49 yearso/o late Shri. Kilpady Govinda BhatResiding at No.70, Anantha Villa#[th]B Main RoadNarayanappa BlockRT Nagar, Bangalore-560032PAN No.ADOPB 9307 LRepresented by Smt. Rajani C Bhat.
_.. Petition
4By Mr. Darshan L, for
Mr. M.S. Shyamsundar, Advocate)
AND:
1,The Principal Commissioner of|Income Tax (Central)Office of Pr. CIT, Central Revenue Bldg.,Queens Road, Bengaluru-560001.Income Tax (Central)Office of Pr. CIT, Central Revenue Bldg.,Queens Road, Bengaluru-560001.
oDThe Director General ofIncome-Tax (Investigations)Ottice of DGIT (Inv)Central Revenue Bldg.,Queens Road, Bengaluru-560001.
... Respondents|
4By Mr. K.V. Aravind, Advocate for R1 & R2)
Date of Order 22-10-2018 W.P.No.30405/2018 Shri. Chandrashekar Bhat Vs. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) & Anr.
2/4
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 ot!the Constitution of India praying to issue an appropriate writor order in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugnedendorsement issued by the l Respondent dated O4-0/7-2018, bearing No. F No. 18(108)/Rel. /Pr.CIT(C)/208-19 videAnnexure-A to the writ petition & etc.
This Writ Petition coming on for preliminary hearing in‘B’ Group this day, the Court made the following:-
ORDER
Mr. Darshan L,Mr. M.S. Shyamsundar, Adv. for Petitioner ©Mr. K.V. Aravind,Adv. for R1 & R2
1. The present writ petition has been filed by thepetitioner seeking the release of Jewellery, Bullion,silver articles, foreign currency and other articles seizedin the course oft search underSection 132.ot the.Income Tax Act on04/05/2013.
2. The said release was denied by the Respondent
- the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central),
Bengaluru, vide communicationAnnexure Adated04/07/2018OT]the.sroundthat|the.appellate
Date of Order 22-10-2018 W.P.No.30405/2018 Shri. Chandrashekar Bhat Vs. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) & Anr.
3/4
proceedings initiated at the instance of the Departmentagainst the assessment of tax liability of the Assesseewere pending before the Tribunal.
3. Today, the learned counsel for the RespondentDepartment, Mr. K.V. Aravind makes a statement thatin view of the Circular of the Central Board for Direct|Taxes (CBDT), the appeal filed by the Revenue havingrevenue stakes less than the prescribed limit, stooddisposed of by the Tribunal and therefore, the impugnedendorsementAnnexure Adated04/07/2018may itselfrequire a reconsideration at the hands of the Revenue,the Department.
4 [In view of the said statement of the learnedcounsel for the Respondent Department, the presentwrit petition is disposed of with a direction to theRespondent Authority, viz. the Principal Commissionerof Income Tax (Central), Central Revenue Building,Queen’s Road, Bengaluru, to re-consider the request for
Date of Order 22-10-2018 W.P.No.30405/2018
Shri. Chandrashekar Bhat Vs. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) & Anr.
4/4
release of the seized articles of the petitioner afresh
expeditiously within a period of four weeks from today.
BMV*
Sd/-.
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.