Case LawHigh Court › Date v. J.p. Devadhar, J

Date v. J.p. Devadhar, J

High Court 29 Jun 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Date v. J.p. Devadhar, J
Date of order
29 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Date v. J.p. Devadhar, J, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2095 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Shashi Aggarwal ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr. Bhatnagar i/b N.R. Prajapati for the Appellant.Dr. Daniel i/b Vishnu S. Hadade for the Respondent. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR ,JJ. 29th June, 2009 DATE : P.C. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This appeal is directed against the order passed by the ITAT deleting the quantum addition made by the Assessing Officer. It is brought to our notice that, quantum appeal filed by the Revenue against the decision of the Tribunal bearing No.5289/Mum/05 was subject matter in appeal before this Court being Income Tax Appeal No.461 of 2008 (Commissioner of Income Tax – II Vs. Shri Shashi Aggarwal) and the same was rejected vide order dated 4[th] September, 2008. In this view of matter, we find no substantial question of law involved in this appeal. Appeal stands dismissed in limini for want of substantial question of law for the reasons recorded in the order dated 4[th] September, 2008 with no order as to costs. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan