Case LawHigh Court › Date v. J.p.devadhar,J

Date v. J.p.devadhar,J

High Court 25 Jun 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Date v. J.p.devadhar,J
Date of order
25 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Date v. J.p.devadhar,J, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: In this view of the matter, the present appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.873 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.M/s.Seksaria Biswan Sugar Factory Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. Mr.Y.P.Trivedi, Senior Advocate with Ms.Usha Dalal for respondent. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 25[th] June,2009 DATE : P.C. Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal involving an identical issue being ITXA No.177 of 2001 between the same parties has already been dismissed by this Court by an order dated 4[th] February, 2008. Even otherwise, he brought to our notice a judgment of the Apex Court in the case of CIT Vs. PonniSugars and Chemicals Ltd. (2008) 306 ITR 392 (SC), wherein, both the issues involved in the present appeal have been considered and decided against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee. In this view of the matter, the present appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law. No order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan