Case LawHigh Court › Date v. M/S.oman International Bank Saog...

Date v. M/S.oman International Bank Saog, In Income Taxappeal

High Court 25 Jun 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Date v. M/S.oman International Bank Saog, In Income Taxappeal
Date of order
25 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Date v. M/S.oman International Bank Saog, In Income Taxappeal, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Decision: In this view of the matter, for the reasons stated therein, the the appeal stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1745 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.M/s.Sanjog Equipment Pvt. Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr.J.S.Saluja for appellant. P.C. Heard. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 25[th] June,2009 DATE : Office objections are overruled. Registry is directed to register the appeal. Learned Counsel for the appellant fairly states that the issue sought to be raised in the present appeal has already been considered and answered by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Director of Income Tax(International Taxation) Vs. M/s.Oman International Bank SAOG, in Income TaxAppeal No.114 of 2009 decided on 9th February, 2009 (unreported). In this view of the matter, for the reasons stated therein, the the appeal stands disposed of. No order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan