In Dated : 16Th April 2009 v. M/S.akshay Textiles, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: 3.In the above view of the matter, appeal is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 317 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax-3,Mumbai.
V/s.
M/s.Anuchit Traders P.Ltd.
... Appellant.
... Respondent.
Vimal Gupta for the appellant.
J.D.Mistry with P.C.Tripathi for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 16th April 2009.
P.C. :----
.Hear learned counsel for the rivalparties.2.Learned counsel appearingfor theappelant- Revenue fairly states that the solequestion sought to be raised in this appeal iscovered by the judgment of Division Bench of thisCourt to which one of us (J.D.Devadhar) is a member,passed in Income Tax Appeal No.607/2005 (TheCommission of Income-tax-3 v. M/s.Akshay Textiles
Trading & Agencies Pvt.Ltd.) decided on 17th October,
2008.
3.In the above view of the matter, appeal is
dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue