Case LawHigh Court › Dated : 27[Th] March 2024 v. Assistant C...

Dated : 27[Th] March 2024 v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 3(2)(1), Mumbai & Ors.[1

High Court 27 Mar 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Dated : 27[Th] March 2024 v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 3(2)(1), Mumbai & Ors.[1
Date of order
27 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Dated : 27[Th] March 2024 v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 3(2)(1), Mumbai & Ors.[1, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

DigitallyPURTIsigned byPURTIPRASADPRASADPARABPARABDate:2024.04.0210:56:17+0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 13880 OF 2023 ALONGWITHWRIT PETITION NO. 13885 OF 2023 Rajegaonkar Project Private Limited ….Petitioner V/s.Income Tax Officer, ITO Ward 2(1), Nashik and Ors.…Respondents ---- None for Petitioner.Mr. Suresh Kuamr for Respondents-Revenue. ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATED : 27[th] MARCH 2024 P.C. : 1.Petitioner absent. Mr. Suresh Kumar states that both thepetitions will be covered by the judgment of New India Assurance Co. Ltd.V/s Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 3(2)(1), Mumbai & Ors.[1]. 2Therefore, impugned orders passed under Section 148 (A)d ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) and the notices issued under Section148 of the Act in both the petitions are hereby quashed and set aside. 3.Petitions disposed. 4.Consequential notices or orders, if any, also stand quashed and set aside. 5.All other rights and contentions which have been raised in the petitions are also kept open. (DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan