Dated : 27[Th] March 2024 v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 3(2)(1), Mumbai & Ors.[1
High Court
27 Mar 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Dated : 27[Th] March 2024 v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 3(2)(1), Mumbai & Ors.[1
Date of order
27 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Dated : 27[Th] March 2024 v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 3(2)(1), Mumbai & Ors.[1, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
DigitallyPURTIsigned byPURTIPRASADPRASADPARABPARABDate:2024.04.0210:56:17+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 13880 OF 2023 ALONGWITHWRIT PETITION NO. 13885 OF 2023
Rajegaonkar Project Private Limited
….Petitioner
V/s.Income Tax Officer, ITO Ward 2(1), Nashik and Ors.…Respondents
----
None for Petitioner.Mr. Suresh Kuamr for Respondents-Revenue.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.
DATED : 27[th] MARCH 2024
P.C. :
1.Petitioner absent. Mr. Suresh Kumar states that both thepetitions will be covered by the judgment of New India Assurance Co. Ltd.V/s Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 3(2)(1), Mumbai & Ors.[1].
2Therefore, impugned orders passed under Section 148 (A)d ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) and the notices issued under Section148 of the Act in both the petitions are hereby quashed and set aside.
3.Petitions disposed.
4.Consequential notices or orders, if any, also stand quashed and
set aside.
5.All other rights and contentions which have been raised in the
petitions are also kept open.
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.