Dated This The 8[Th] Day Of March, 2018 v. Commissioner Of Income Tax_ (2016 (2) Klt 535
High Court
08 Mar 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Dated This The 8[Th] Day Of March, 2018 v. Commissioner Of Income Tax_ (2016 (2) Klt 535
Date of order
08 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Dated This The 8[Th] Day Of March, 2018 v. Commissioner Of Income Tax_ (2016 (2) Klt 535, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
THURSDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 17TH PHALGUNA, 1939
WP(C).No. 7921 of 2018
PETITIONER:
M/S. KULAPPULLY SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD.
GOVERNMENT PRESS POST, SHORANUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT,
PIN-679122., REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SHRI P.V.RAJAN.
BY SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SENIOR ADVOCATE)
ADVS.SMT.VANDANA MENON
SMT.DIVYA RAVINDRAN
SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3, PALAKKAD. PIN-678001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEAL) AAYAKAR BHAWAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR-680 001.
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 08-03-2018,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION DATED 18.01.2017 ISSUED BY THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), PALAKKAD.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF ASST. ORDER AND DEMAND NOTICE DATED 28.03.2016. FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2013-2014 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF ASST.ORDER AND DEMAND NOTICE DATED 21.12.2016 FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2014-2015 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. DATED 28.03.2016. FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2013-2014 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF ASST.ORDER AND DEMAND NOTICE DATED 21.12.2016 FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2014-2015 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF ASST. ORDER AND DEMAND NOTICE DATED 29.11.2016 FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2015-2016 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED 23.04.2016 FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2013-2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.EXHIBIT P5(A) TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 23.04.2016 FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2013-2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED 23.01.2017 FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2014-2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.EXHIBIT P6(A) TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 23.01.2017 FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2014-2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED 04.01.2018 FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2015-2016 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. DATED 29.11.2016 FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2015-2016 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED 23.04.2016 FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2013-2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.EXHIBIT P5(A) TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 23.04.2016 FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2013-2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED 23.01.2017 FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2014-2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.EXHIBIT P6(A) TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 23.01.2017 FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2014-2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED 04.01.2018 FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2015-2016 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P7(A) TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 4.1.2018 FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2015-16 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. THE ASST. YEAR 2015-16 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P7(A) TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 4.1.2018 FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2015-16 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. THE ASST. YEAR 2015-16 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF PETITION FILED U/S.220(6) OF THE ACT DATED 25.04.2016 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2013-2014. DATED 25.04.2016 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2013-2014.
EXHIBIT P8(A) TRUE COPY OF PETITION FILED U/S.220(6) OF THE ACT DATED 23.01.2017 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2014-15. DATED 23.01.2017 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2014-15.
PBS
WP(C).No. 7921 of 2018 (M)
EXHIBIT P8(B) TRUE COPY OF PETITION FILED U/S. 220(6) OF THE ACT DATED 04.01.2018 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2015-2016.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBIT
NIL
/TRUE COPY/
PBS13/3/2018
PA TO JUDGE
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
.........................................
W.P.(C).No.7921 of 2018
..........................................
Dated this the 8[th] day of March, 2018.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner as against the assessment order, preferredan appeal. He also filed a stay application. Learned counsel for thepetitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled for exemption inthe light of a Division Bench judgment of this Court reported inChirakkal Service Co-operative Bank Ltd v. Commissioner ofIncome Tax (2016 (2) KLT 535).
2. In the light of the facts and circumstances, there shall be adirection to the 2[nd] respondent to dispose of the stay applicationafter adverting to the judgment as above within a period of twomonths. Till the disposal of the stay application, the recoveryproceedings shall be kept in abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE,
JUDGE.
Cl
// true copy //
P.S to Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.