Daulat Ram Maghar Ram, Bhawanigarh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala
High Court
03 Feb 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Daulat Ram Maghar Ram, Bhawanigarh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala
Date of order
03 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Daulat Ram Maghar Ram, Bhawanigarh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 396 of 2015, no furtherorders are required to be passed in the application for condonation ofdelay in filing the appeal and the same is disposed of as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ITA No. 407 of 2015 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 3.2.2016
Daulat Ram Maghar Ram, Bhawanigarh
Versus
....Appellant.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala
...Respondent.
1.Whether the Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?the judgment?
2.To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAJ RAHUL GARG.
PRESENT: Mr. Divya Suri, Advocate for the appellant.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
1.There is a delay of 128 days in filing the appeal. CM No.23983-CII of 2015 has been filed for condonation of 128 days' delay infiling the appeal. Since the appeal has been dismissed on merits vide acommon order of even date passed in ITA No. 396 of 2015, no furtherorders are required to be passed in the application for condonation ofdelay in filing the appeal and the same is disposed of as such.
2.For orders, see ITA No. 396 of 2015 (Gurdev AgroEngineers, Bhawanigarh v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala).
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)
JUDGE
February 3, 2016
gbs
(RAJ RAHUL GARG)
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue