D.b. Civil Miscellaneous Application v. M/S Vaibhav Gems
High Court
20 Feb 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
D.b. Civil Miscellaneous Application v. M/S Vaibhav Gems
Date of order
20 Feb 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In D.b. Civil Miscellaneous Application v. M/S Vaibhav Gems, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR
D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 35 / 2017Commissioner Of Income Tax Jaipur-Ii
----Petitioner
Versus
M/S Vaibhav Gems
----Respondent
_____________________________________________________
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Ishita Rawat for Mr. Gunjan PathakFor Respondent(s) : Mr. K.D. Mathur for Mr. R.B. Mathur
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHURJudgment / Order
20/02/2017
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the applicationis allowed. The order dated 18[th] January, 2017 is recalled.
The appeal stands disposed off in terms of the order dated2[nd] November, 2016 in DB Income Tax Appeal No. 584/2009 (CITvs. Shri Abhay Godha) wherein it has been held:-
“Considering the law declared by the SupremeCourt in the case of Vijay Proteins Ltd. Vs.Commissioner of Income Tax, Special Leave toAppeal (C) No.8956/2015 decided on06.04.2015 whereby the Supreme Court hasdismissed the SLP and confirmed the orderdated 09.12.2014 passed by the Gujarat HighCourt and other decisions of the High Court ofGujarat in the case of Sanjay Oilcake IndustriesVs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2009) 316 ITR274 (Guj) and N.K. Industries Ltd. Vs. Dy. C.I.T.,Tax Appeal No.240/2003 decided on 20.06.2016,the parties are bound by the principle of lawpronounced in the aforesaid three judgments.We remit back the case to the Assessing Officer
for deciding afresh on the factual matrix. Theauthority will accept the law but the transactionwhether it is genuine or not will be verified bythe Assessing Officer on the basis of theaforesaid three judgments. The issues areanswered accordingly. The appeal is accordinglydisposed of.”
The appeal is accordingly disposed off.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR)J. (K.S. JHAVERI) ACTING CJ.
A.Sharma/66
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.