Case LawHigh Court › D.b. Civil Miscellaneous Application v....

D.b. Civil Miscellaneous Application v. Shri Prakash Chand Vijay Jaipur

High Court 04 May 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
D.b. Civil Miscellaneous Application v. Shri Prakash Chand Vijay Jaipur
Date of order
04 May 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In D.b. Civil Miscellaneous Application v. Shri Prakash Chand Vijay Jaipur, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 36 / 2017Commissioner Of Income Tax Jaipur-Ii ----Petitioner Versus Shri Prakash Chand Vijay Jaipur ----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aditya Bohra for Mr. Gunjan PathakFor Respondent(s) : Mr. K.D. Mathur for Mr. R.B. Mathur _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR VYAS Order 04/05/2017 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same isallowed. InviewoftheorderpassedinDB ITA No. 580/2009 (CIT vs. Shri Abhay Godha) decided on 2[nd]November, 2016 which reads as under:- “3. Considering the law declared by the SupremeCourt in the case of Vijay Proteins Ltd. Vs.Commissioner of Income Tax, Special Leave toAppeal (C) No.8956/2015 decided on 06.04.2015whereby the Supreme Court has dismissed the SLPand confirmed the order dated 09.12.2014 passedby the Gujarat High Court and other decisions ofthe High Court of Gujarat in the case of SanjayOilcake Industries Vs. Commissioner of IncomeTax (2009) 316 ITR 274 (Guj) and N.K. IndustriesLtd. Vs. Dy. C.I.T., Tax Appeal No.240/2003decided on 20.06.2016, the parties are bound bythe principle of law pronounced in the aforesaidthree judgments. 4. We remit back the case to the Assessing Officer for deciding afresh on the factual matrix. Theauthority will accept the law but the transactionwhether it is genuine or not will be verified by theAssessing Officer on the basis of the aforesaidthree judgments. The issues are answeredaccordingly. The appeal is accordingly disposed of. In view of the above, the application is allowed and theappeal stands disposed off in above terms. (VIJAY KUMAR VYAS),J. A.Sharma/127 (K.S. JHAVERI),J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan