D.b. Civil Restoration Application v. Shri Vishnu Prasad Maharwal
High Court
30 Nov 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
D.b. Civil Restoration Application v. Shri Vishnu Prasad Maharwal
Date of order
30 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In D.b. Civil Restoration Application v. Shri Vishnu Prasad Maharwal, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR
D.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 202 / 2017 Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
Shri Vishnu Prasad Maharwal, 60, Ratan Nagar, Dher Ke Balaji, Sikar Road, Jaipur
----Respondent
D.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 203 / 2017 Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Jaipur
----Petitioner Versus
Shri Vishnu Prasad Maharwal, 60, Ratan Nagar, Dher Ke Balaji, Sikar Road, Jaipur
----Respondent
_____________________________________________________
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Anil Mehta with
Mr. Sameer Sharma
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Siddharth Ranka
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR VYAS
Order
30/11/2017
Delay in filing the restoration applications is condoned.
The applications u/s 5 of the Limitation Act are allowed.
For the reasons mentioned in the applications, the same are
allowed. The appeals are restored to its original number and same
be listed today itself.
(VIJAY KUMAR VYAS)J.
B. M.G/Gourav/133-134
(K.S. JHAVERI)J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.