In D.b. Civil Restoraton Application v. Mahendra Kumar Agarwal, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR
D.B. Civil Restoraton Application No. 467 / 2016Commissioner Of Income Tax Central
----Petitioner
Versus
Mahendra Kumar Agarwal
----Respondent
_____________________________________________________
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Archana for Mr. Anil MehtaFor Respondent(s) :
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
02/02/2017
On the oral submission of counsel for the appellant, delay infiling the restoration application is condoned.
For the reasons stated in the restoration application, therestoration application is allowed. The appeal is restored to itsoriginal number.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR)J.
(K.S. JHAVERI)J.
A.Sharma/129
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue