Case LawHigh Court › D.b. Civil Review v. Jaipur Development...

D.b. Civil Review v. Jaipur Development Authority, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur

High Court 06 Sep 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
D.b. Civil Review v. Jaipur Development Authority, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur
Date of order
06 Sep 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In D.b. Civil Review v. Jaipur Development Authority, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR D.B. Civil Review No. 19 / 2017 Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Kailash Heights, IIIrd Floor, Lalkothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur- 302015. ----Petitioner Versus Jaipur Development Authority, J.L.N. Marg, Jaipur. ----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Appellant(s) : Mr. Sameer Jain with Mr. Daksh PareekFor Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjay Jhanwar with Ms. Archana _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH Order 06/09/2017 Delay in filing the review petition is condoned. Theapplication u/s 5 of the Limitation Act is allowed. For the reasons mentioned in the review petition, the sameis allowed. The order dated 18[th] October, 2016 is recalled andIncome Tax Appeal No. 113/2016 is restored, the same may belisted today itself. (INDERJEET SINGH)J. (K.S.JHAVERI)J. A.Sharma/
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan