D.b. Civil Review Petition v. Order
High Court
20 Jul 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
D.b. Civil Review Petition v. Order
Date of order
20 Jul 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In D.b. Civil Review Petition v. Order, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Consequently, the instant review petition, in our consideredview, is without substance, accordingly stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR
D.B. Civil Review Petition No. 39 / 2016inD.B.Income Tax Appeal No.405/2009.
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-3, NCR Building, StatuteCircle, C-Scheme, Jaipur.----Petitioner
VersusM/S Mangilal & Party, Village, Andhi, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, Jaipur(Raj.)----Respondent
_____________________________________________________
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Sameer Jain, Adv.
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAINENDRA KUMAR RANKA
Order
20/07/2017
Matter has come up on the application for recalling of theorder dt.05.02.2016 which was passed because of low tax effectkeeping in view the Circular of CBDT No.21/2015 dt.10.12.2015.
After we have heard counsel for the review petitioner, wefind that the order under challenge was passed u/Sec.271(1)(c) ofthe Act, 1961 where the penalty imposed is less than Rs.20 Lakhsand taking note thereof, certainly the matter was covered by thecircular dt.10.12.2015, of which reference has been made supra.
Consequently, the instant review petition, in our consideredview, is without substance, accordingly stands dismissed.
(JAINENDRA KUMAR RANKA)J.
(AJAY RASTOGI)J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.