Case LawHigh Court › D.b. Civil Review Petition v. M/S. Rajas...

D.b. Civil Review Petition v. M/S. Rajasthan Statehandloom, Development Corporation Ltd. Jaipur

High Court 24 Jan 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
D.b. Civil Review Petition v. M/S. Rajasthan Statehandloom, Development Corporation Ltd. Jaipur
Date of order
24 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In D.b. Civil Review Petition v. M/S. Rajasthan Statehandloom, Development Corporation Ltd. Jaipur, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHANAT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER D.B. Civil Review Petition No. 47/2012inD.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 504/2011Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Jaipur versus M/s. Rajasthan StateHandloom, Development Corporation Ltd. Jaipur Date of Order : 24[th] January, 2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAINHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAINENDRA KUMAR RANKA Mr . J. K. Si nghi Sr . Counsel wi t h Mr . Anur oopSi nghi , f or t he pet i t i oner . Thi s r evi ew pet i t i on i s bar r ed by101 days. Lear ned counsel f or t he pet i t i onerhas f i l ed an appl i cat i on f or condonat i on ofdel ay. Af t erconsi der i ngt her easonsassi gned i n t he appl i cat i on, we ar e notsat i sf i ed t hat t hi s i s a f i t case wher ei ndel ay can be condoned, hence, appl i cat i onunder Sect i on 5 of t he Li mi t at i on Actdeser ves t o be di smi ssed and t he same i sher eby di smi ssed. That apar t , we have al so consi der edt he case of mer i t s. We f i nd no r eason t o 2 D.B. CreviewP No. 47/2012 r evi ew t he or der dat ed 4[t h]Januar y, 2012 passed by t hi s Cour t . I n vi ew ofabove,t he r evi ewpet i t i on i s di smi ssed bei ng bar r ed byl i mi t at i on as wel l as on mer i t s. (JAINENDRA KUMAR RANKA),J. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. Mak/- 17 All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.” Anil Makawana Jr. P.A.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan