In D.b. Income Tax Appeal v. Adl.comm.of Income Tax, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: The appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 140 / 2004Aklank Kumar Bagda
----Appellant
Versus
Adl.Comm.Of Income Tax
----Respondent
_____________________________________________________
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Prakhul Khurana for Mr. Sanjay JhanwarFor Respondent(s) : Ms. Archana for Mr. Anil Mehta
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHURJudgment / Order
24/01/2017
1.By way of this appeal, the appellant has assailed thejudgment & order of the Tribunal whereby the Tribunal hasdismissed the appeal and confirmed the order of CIT(A).
2.This Court while admitting the matter framed the following
question:-
“Under the facts and circumstances of the casewhether ld. ITAT was justified in sustaining thepenalty of Rs. 1,25,000/- u/s 271D of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 in respect of alleged cashfound with the assessee belonging to otherperson.”
3.In view of the concurrent finding and fact that in substancethe original assessment was upheld, in view of the matter, we
see no reason for interference. The issue is answered in favour
of the department and against the assessee.
The appeal stands dismissed.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR)J.
(K.S. JHAVERI)J.
A.Sharma/13
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.