D.b. Income Tax Appeal v. Subhas Chandra Agarwal
High Court
09 Nov 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
D.b. Income Tax Appeal v. Subhas Chandra Agarwal
Date of order
09 Nov 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In D.b. Income Tax Appeal v. Subhas Chandra Agarwal, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, this appeal stands dismissed in view of theaforesaid order dated 25.10.2012 and in the same terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
18
D.B. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 61/2012.CIT-I, Jodhppur Vs. Subhas Chandra Agarwal
..
Date of Order :: 9[th] November 2012.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARIHON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI
Mr. Arun Bhansali, for the appellant.
<><>
BY THE COURT:
The learned counsel for the appellant frankly submits thatthe issues sought to be raised in this appeal stand covered by thedecision of this Court in D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 35/2012 :Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Jodhpur Vs. Subhas ChandraAgarwal relating to the same assessee but for the assessmentyear 2005-06; and has placed before us for perusal a copy of theorder dated 25.10.2012 as passed in the said appeal, ITA No.35/2012.
After having going through the material placed on record,we are satisfied that the issues sought to be raised herein standsquarely covered by the decision aforesaid.
Accordingly, this appeal stands dismissed in view of theaforesaid order dated 25.10.2012 and in the same terms.
(DR. VINEET KOTHARI),J. (DINESH MAHESHWARI),J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue