D.b. Income Tax Appeal v. Shri Manohar Lal Sanghvi
High Court
24 Nov 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
D.b. Income Tax Appeal v. Shri Manohar Lal Sanghvi
Date of order
24 Nov 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In D.b. Income Tax Appeal v. Shri Manohar Lal Sanghvi, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHANAT JAIPUR BENCH***
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.241/2010Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.
Shri Manohar Lal Sanghvi
DATE OF ORDER : 24/11/2010
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ARUN MISHRAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALIP SINGH
***
Mr.JK Singhi, for appellant
This appeal has been preferred against theorder passed by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal.
The question raised in the instant appealis that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal isnot justified in deleting the addition made bythe Assessing Authority and affirmed by theCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on accountof suppressed sale made by the assessee duringthe search carried out under Section 132 of theAct. The addition made on account of suppressedsales was Rs.41,167/-
It is apparent that the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal has taken into considerationvarious factual matrix and the seized materialand the inference, which was drawn by theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, is purely basedon question of facts. The additions made alsocannot be said to be much so as to warrantinterference in purely finding of fact. Even
2
otherwise, we do not find any justification ininterfering with the findings recorded by theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal. No substantialquestion law is involved in the instant appeal.Consequently, the appeal is herebydismissed.
, J.
(ARUN MISHRA),ACTG.CJ.
Raghu/p.2/241-ITA-2010-Final.doc
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.