Case LawHigh Court › Db Income Tax Appeal v. M/S Vijay Solvex...

Db Income Tax Appeal v. M/S Vijay Solvex Ltd., Bhagwati Sadan, S.d. Marg, Alwar

High Court 15 Nov 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Db Income Tax Appeal v. M/S Vijay Solvex Ltd., Bhagwati Sadan, S.d. Marg, Alwar
Date of order
15 Nov 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Db Income Tax Appeal v. M/S Vijay Solvex Ltd., Bhagwati Sadan, S.d. Marg, Alwar, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: 2.This Court while admitting the matter framed the following questions which reads as under: “i) Whether the findings of theTribunal are perverse in deletingthe addition of Rs.

Decision: 1.By way of this appeal the department hasassailed the judgment & order of the Tribunalwhereby the Tribunal has dismissed the appealpreferred by the department and the appeal of theassessee is allowed in part.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR DB Income Tax Appeal No.3/2006The Commissioner of Income Tax, Alwar. vs. M/s Vijay Solvex Ltd., Bhagwati Sadan, S.D. Marg, Alwar. Date of Order : 15.11.2016 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDRA MAHESHWARI Mrs. Parinitoo Jain for the appellant.Mr. Sanjay Jhanwar for the respondent. 1.By way of this appeal the department hasassailed the judgment & order of the Tribunalwhereby the Tribunal has dismissed the appealpreferred by the department and the appeal of theassessee is allowed in part. 2.This Court while admitting the matter framed the following questions which reads as under: “i) Whether the findings of theTribunal are perverse in deletingthe addition of Rs. 6,43,330/- onaccount of dryuing loss when thebooks of accounts were rejected u/s145? ii) Whether the findings of theTribunal are perverse in deletingthe addition of Rs. 52,53,607/- madeby the A.O. on account of non-acceptance of trading results?” 3.The Tribunal has relied upon the previousdecision which was challenged by the assessee byTax Appeal No. 134/2004 which is dismissed. Inview of the decision of this Court which has beenfollowed by the Tribunal, in our view, the same isrequired to be accepted. 4. Hence the issue is answered in favour of theassessee against the department. 5. The appeal is dismissed. (MAHENDRA MAHESHWARI),J. (K.S.JHAVERI),J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan