Case LawHigh Court › D.b. Income Tax Appeal v. M/S. Udaipur D...

D.b. Income Tax Appeal v. M/S. Udaipur Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Sanghlimited, Udaipur

High Court 13 May 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
D.b. Income Tax Appeal v. M/S. Udaipur Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Sanghlimited, Udaipur
Date of order
13 May 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In D.b. Income Tax Appeal v. M/S. Udaipur Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Sanghlimited, Udaipur, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: For the reasons mentioned in the judgment passed in ITANo.48/2012, this appeal is also dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

D.B. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.50/2012Commissioner of Income Tax, UdaipurVs.M/s. Udaipur Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari SanghLimited, Udaipur. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR : J U D G M E N T : D.B. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.50/2012Commissioner of Income Tax, Udaipur Vs. M/s. Udaipur Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari SanghLimited, Udaipur. Date of Judgment :: PRESENT 13[th] May, 2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAINHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr. K.K. Bissa, for the appellant. ---- BY THE COURT: The appellant has filed an application for dispensing withthe requirement of filing the certified copy of the order dated16.12.2011 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same isallowed. The requirement of filing the certified copy of the orderimpugned is dispensed with. This appeal has been filed by the Revenue aggrieved bythe order dated 16.12.2011 passed by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur ('ITAT') in ITANo.352/JU./2010 for the assessment year 2007-08, whereby,the appeal filed by it against the order dated 15.03.2010 passedby the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Udaipur ['CIT D.B. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.50/2012Commissioner of Income Tax, UdaipurVs.M/s. Udaipur Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari SanghLimited, Udaipur. 2 (A)') has been dismissed. The issue raised in the present appeal is identical to theappeal filed by the Revenue being D.B. Income Tax AppealNo.48/2012 (CIT, Udaipur vs. M/s. Udaipur Dugdh UtpadakSahakari Sangh Ltd., Udaipur), which appeal also arose out ofthe same order dated 16.12.2011 passed by the ITAT relating toassessment year 2006-07. The present appeal is based on theself same grounds as raised in ITA No.48/2012. For the reasons mentioned in the judgment passed in ITANo.48/2012, this appeal is also dismissed. No costs. (ARUN BHANSALI),J. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. A.K. ChouhanS/2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan