D.b. Income Tax Appeal v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur
High Court
09 Mar 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
D.b. Income Tax Appeal v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur
Date of order
09 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In D.b. Income Tax Appeal v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: The review petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Review Petition No.73/2016
In
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.6/2002
Smt. Shanti Devi, Subhash Bazar, Tonk
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur
2. The Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-2JaipurJaipur
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
09/03/2023
None for the petitioner.
This review petition has been filed against the order dated31.08.2016 by which the appeal has been dismissed.
Several defects have been pointed out by the Registry. Thereview petition is also barred by limitation. The review petition hasremained pending under defects ever since it was filed and despiteseveral opportunities granted, defects have not been cured. Thereis no one present on behalf of the petitioner also.
Otherwise also there is no merit in this review petition and itis more an appeal in disguise.
The review petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJKaran/17
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.