D.b. Income Tax Misc. Application v. The Competent Authority (Addl. Commissioner Of I.t
High Court
26 Mar 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
D.b. Income Tax Misc. Application v. The Competent Authority (Addl. Commissioner Of I.t
Date of order
26 Mar 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In D.b. Income Tax Misc. Application v. The Competent Authority (Addl. Commissioner Of I.t, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJSATHANAT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
D.B. Income Tax Misc. Application No.141/2011M/s. Navin Grah Nirman Sahakari Samiti
vs.
The Competent Authority (Addl. Commissioner of I.T.)
26.03.2012
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ARUN MISHRAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
Mr. N.M. Ranka, Sr. Advocate assisted by
Mr. N.K. Jain, for petitioner.
The S.L.P. against the impugned order has already beendismissed. An application has been filed under Section 261 of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 read with Section 109 CPC for grant ofcertificate under Section 261 of the Income Tax Act read with Article133(1) of the Constitution of India certifying that it is a fit case forfiling civil appeal before the Supreme Court.
In the facts and circumstances of the case and consideringthe order passed by this Court and also the aforesaid dismissal ofthe S.L.P. by the Supreme Court, we are not inclined to entertainthe application for grant of certificate. Besides, there is delay infiling the application, which has not been satisfactorily explained bythe applicant. On that ground also, the application is liable to bedismissed.
Accordingly, the income tax misc. application is dismissed onthe aforesaid grounds. Stay Application No.3061/2011 and I.A.No.27271/2011 are also dismissed.
(MOHAMMAD RAFIQ),J.
Mohit/S/5
(ARUN MISHRA),C.J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.