Case LawHigh Court › D.b. Review Petition (Writ) v. Asst. Com...

D.b. Review Petition (Writ) v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2, Jaipur

High Court 22 Aug 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
D.b. Review Petition (Writ) v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2, Jaipur
Date of order
22 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In D.b. Review Petition (Writ) v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2, Jaipur, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The review petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.The application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is alsodisposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Review Petition (Writ) No.249/2018 Faraday Electricals Pvt. Ltd., Having Registered Office At 36-Gopal Bari, Ajmer Road, Through Abhinav Saboo S/o Mr. S.k.Saboo, Aged About 46 Years, R/o - 36- Gopal Bari, Ajmer Road,Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2, Jaipur. 2. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anuroop Singhi withMr. N.S. Bhati HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 22/08/2019 Learned counsel for petitioner submits that this reviewpetition has become infructuous and prays for its dismissal assuch. The review petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.The application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is alsodisposed of. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J(MOHAMMAD RAFIQ),J //Jaiman//9
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan