D.b.civil Misc. Restoration Application v. Umesh Saboo
High Court
04 Mar 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
D.b.civil Misc. Restoration Application v. Umesh Saboo
Date of order
04 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In D.b.civil Misc. Restoration Application v. Umesh Saboo, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
D.B.CIVIL MISC. RESTORATION APPLICATION NO.824/2012.IND.B.INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.480/2009.CIT, Jaipur-II, Jaipur. VS. Umesh Saboo.
04.03.2013.
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGIHON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JAINENDRA KUMAR RANKA
Mr.Nikhil Simlote on behalf ofMr.R.B.Mathur, for the appellant.
*****
Application has been filed for recalling/restoration ofthe appeal, which was dismissed on account of peremptoryorder passed by the court along with an application seekingcondonation of delay in filing the restoration application.
This court is satisfied with the explanation furnished forthe delay caused in filing the application duly supported byan affidavit.
Accordingly, the application seeking condonation ofdelay U/s.5 of Limitation Act and the restoration applicationboth stand allowed subject to deposition of Rs.500/- by theapplicant with the Secretary, State Legal Services Authority,receipt whereof be filed in the registry, on doing so the ordershall stand recalled and the appeal be restored to its originalnumber.
Office to proceed.
(JAINENDRA KUMAR RANKA),J. (AJAY RASTOGI), J.
All corrections made in judgment/order have beenincorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.Solanki DS, P.A.incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.Solanki DS, P.A.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.