D.b.civil Restoration Application v. Union Of India & Ors
High Court
11 Feb 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
D.b.civil Restoration Application v. Union Of India & Ors
Date of order
11 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In D.b.civil Restoration Application v. Union Of India & Ors, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the application seeking condonation of delayu/Sec.5 of Limitation Act and the restoration application both standallowed subject to deposition of Rs.500/- by the applicant with theSecretary, State Legal Services Authority, receipt whereof be filedin the registry, on doing so the order sh...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
D.B.Civil Restoration Application No.108/2014.InD.B.Income Tax Appeal No.191/2010.Mehar Chand Jain & Sons. VERSUS Union of India & Ors.
11.02.2016.
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGIHON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.K.RANKA
Mr.Anant Kasliwal, Counsel for applicant.Mr.Anuroop Singhi, Counsel for respondents.
*****
Application has been filed for recalling/restoration of theappeal, which was dismissed on account of peremptory orderpassed by the court along with an application u/Sec.5 of LimitationAct seeking condonation of delay in filing the restorationapplication.
This court is satisfied with the explanation furnished for thedelay as well, duly supported by an affidavit.
Accordingly, the application seeking condonation of delayu/Sec.5 of Limitation Act and the restoration application both standallowed subject to deposition of Rs.500/- by the applicant with theSecretary, State Legal Services Authority, receipt whereof be filedin the registry, on doing so the order shall stand recalled and theappeal be restored to its original number.
Office to proceed.
(J.K.RANKA),J.
(AJAY RASTOGI),J.
All corrections made in judgment/order have beenincorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.Solanki DS, P.S.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.