D.b.income Tax Appeal v. M/S Singhal Industries, A-103, Brij Industrial Area, Bharatpur
High Court
27 Jan 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
D.b.income Tax Appeal v. M/S Singhal Industries, A-103, Brij Industrial Area, Bharatpur
Date of order
27 Jan 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In D.b.income Tax Appeal v. M/S Singhal Industries, A-103, Brij Industrial Area, Bharatpur, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 4.The appeal stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR
D.B.INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 820 / 2008 Commissioner of Income Tax, Alwar.
----Appellant
Versus
M/S Singhal Industries, A-103, Brij Industrial Area, Bharatpur.
----Respondent
_____________________________________________________
For Appellant(s) : Mrs. Parinitoo Jain.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahendra Gargieya.
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHURJudgment
27/01/2017
1.By way of this appeal, the appellant has challenged thejudgment and order of the Tribunal whereby the Tribunal haspartly allowed the appeal of the assessee and rejected the Misc.Application filed by the assessee.
2.This Court while admitting the appeal on 04.03.2009 hasframed the following substantial question of law:
“(i)Whether, under the facts andcircumstances of the case and in law theTribunal can review its own order under thegarb of rectification and thereby can upsetits own finding of fact without having anymaterial on record?”
3.Counsel for the respondent has contended that the Second
Review Application is not maintainable. In our view, the firstreview application is not entertained, then the appropriate remedy
available is to challenge the same by way of writ petition. Secondreview application is not maintainable.
4.The appeal stands disposed of. However, it will be open forthe revenue to prefer a writ petition within a period of 30 days. Ifsuch an application is preferred, that will be taken intoconsideration.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR)J. (K.S. JHAVERI)J.
Asheesh Kr. Yadav/126
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.