D.b.income Tax Appeal v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Rawla
High Court
03 May 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
D.b.income Tax Appeal v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Rawla
Date of order
03 May 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In D.b.income Tax Appeal v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Rawla, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 5.In this view of the matter, this appeal is also dismissed inlight of decision of this court in Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti,Raisinghnagar's case (supra).
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
ORDER
::::
D.B.INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.151/14 (D) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BIKANER VS.
KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI, RAWLA
::::
Date of Order : 3[rd] May, 2016.
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANGEET LODHAHON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KAILASH CHANDRA SHARMA
Mr.K.K.Bissa with Mr. H.G.Chanda, for the appellant.
BY THE COURT:-
1.The requirement of production of certified copy of theimpugned order is dispensed with.
2.Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
3.This appeal is directed against order dated 25.2.14 of the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur,whereby the appeal preferred by the Revenue, questioning thelegality of the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) [CIT (A)], deleting the additions made by theAssessing Officer while rejecting the claim of the assessee forexemption under Section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961( for short “the Act”), stands dismissed.
4.The controversy involved in the present appeal stands
covered by decision of this court rendered on 26.4.16 inD.B.Income Tax Appeal No.47/13 (Commissioner of Income Tax,Bikaner vs. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Raisinghnagar) & otherconnected appeals, whereby the decision of the ITAT in identicalmatters allowing the claim of the assessee for exemption underSection 11(1)(a) of the Act, has been upheld and accordingly,the appeals have been dismissed.
5.In this view of the matter, this appeal is also dismissed inlight of decision of this court in Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti,Raisinghnagar's case (supra).
(KAILASH CHANDRA SHARMA), J.
(SANGEET LODHA),J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.