In Dcit v. Oman International Bank Saog Reported In, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal.
Issue: Whether cable was required for the purpose of carrying on the business of the assessee has not been considered by any of the authorities below.
Decision: Accordingly, by consent the appeal is allowed by remand.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.599 OF 2008
...
The Commissioner of Income-Tax VI Appellant
v/s.
M/s.The Book Centre Limited Respondent
...
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.
Mr.S.G.Dalal for the Respondent.
...
CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH&
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED:19TH SEPTEMBER, 2008
P.C.:
Rule. Returnable forthwith. Heard finally
by consent of parties.
- 2 -
2. In this case the tribunal has disposed of the
appeal by relying upon its decision in the case of
DCIT Vs. Oman International Bank SAOG reported in
286 ITR 08 (AT)(SB). The grievance of the revenue is
that the amount of bad debts claimed by the assessee
related to advances made for purchasing the cable.
Whether cable was required for the purpose of
carrying on the business of the assessee has not been
considered by any of the authorities below. In the
absence of any finding to that effect, in our
opinion, it would be just and proper to set aside the
order passed by the tribunal and remand the matter
back to the tribunal for denovo consideration.
3. Accordingly, by consent the appeal is allowed by
remand. It will be open to the tribunal to call for
a report from the Assessing Officer regarding the
nature of the business and whether cables were
required for carrying on its business. Appeal is
disposed off accordingly. No order as to costs.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
- 3 -
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.