Case LawHigh Court › Dcit v. Oman International Bank Saog Rep...

Dcit v. Oman International Bank Saog Reported In

High Court 09 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Dcit v. Oman International Bank Saog Reported In
Date of order
09 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Dcit v. Oman International Bank Saog Reported In, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal.

Issue: Whether cable was required for the purpose of carrying on the business of the assessee has not been considered by any of the authorities below.

Decision: Accordingly, by consent the appeal is allowed by remand.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.599 OF 2008 ... The Commissioner of Income-Tax VI Appellant v/s. M/s.The Book Centre Limited Respondent ... Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant. Mr.S.G.Dalal for the Respondent. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH& J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED:19TH SEPTEMBER, 2008 P.C.: Rule. Returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties. - 2 - 2. In this case the tribunal has disposed of the appeal by relying upon its decision in the case of DCIT Vs. Oman International Bank SAOG reported in 286 ITR 08 (AT)(SB). The grievance of the revenue is that the amount of bad debts claimed by the assessee related to advances made for purchasing the cable. Whether cable was required for the purpose of carrying on the business of the assessee has not been considered by any of the authorities below. In the absence of any finding to that effect, in our opinion, it would be just and proper to set aside the order passed by the tribunal and remand the matter back to the tribunal for denovo consideration. 3. Accordingly, by consent the appeal is allowed by remand. It will be open to the tribunal to call for a report from the Assessing Officer regarding the nature of the business and whether cables were required for carrying on its business. Appeal is disposed off accordingly. No order as to costs. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) - 3 - (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan