Case LawHigh Court › Decided On : 20.01.2015 v. Commissioner...

Decided On : 20.01.2015 v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ludhiana

High Court 20 Jan 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Decided On : 20.01.2015 v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ludhiana
Date of order
20 Jan 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Decided On : 20.01.2015 v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ludhiana, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH ITAa177a2013 (O&M) Decided on : 20.01.2015 Smt. Bimla Rani .. Appellant VERSUS Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana ... Respondent CORAMHON5BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJTVE BHALLAHON5BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S. WALIA Present#Mr.Pankaj Jain, Senior Advocate, withMr.Divya Suri, Advocate, for the appellant.Mr.Divya Suri, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr.Rajesh Katoch, Advocate, for the respondent. KK OK K RAJIVE BHALLA, J. w,,CM15126CII2013 Prayer in this application is to condone delay of 149 daysin refiling the appeal. Heard. In view of averments in the application and argumentsaddressed, application is allowed and delay of 149 days in refilingthe appeal is condoned. ITA;177;2013 For orders, see order of even date passed in ITA-176-2013 *Late Sh.Joginder Lal (since deceased) through his LR Smt.Bimla Rani Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana” | RAJIVE BHALLA | JUDGE 20.01 2015 Shamsher S.Sabharwal 1 B.S. WALIA | JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan